Analysis of CalcPad Online structural design spreadsheets according to Eurocode. It will probably be 2021’s learning project. Civil Engineering Excel Sheets or Civil Engineering Spreadsheets are. The free and open source nature of these languages is also very appealing, even for a common Windows user like me. I have been looking at Python and Julia lately, combined with Jupyter notebooks and some additional libraries (plotting, pdf export, LaTeX, data frames, mesh creation, FEM analysis, etc). It’s so easy to make a mistake and have it trickle down the design pipeline that sometimes I wake at night just to check if I haven’t made a mistake… That said, the lack of adequate proofreading in Excel is what bothers me the most. The unit handling capabilities of Mathcad were really never of any interest either (SI units user! ) Additionally, I have used VBA extensively for creating additional tools (moment-curvature analysis, laterally loaded piles, SAP2000 interfaces, etc) so I was never ready to really jump ship to any of those tools. I’ve had a look at them but it seemed like they could never replace Excel properly as there’s always a lot of simultaneous combinations to handle, so the spreadsheet format always seemed more natural to me. I have never used Mathcad or Smath professionally. I’ve done it in Mathcad already but in comparison it seems easier to do in Mathematica. That said, if I had a problem that was very mathematically intricate, such as a spring-mass-damper system needing ODE’s I might prefer to start with Mathematica, given what I’ve seen in the demos and tutorials about setting up the problem. And in my case Smath doesn’t have the stability or product support for me to seriously rely on it for professional work with a variety of coworkers. In my case Maple and Mathematica don’t offer the simple clean output that looks like the algebra/calculus that I would prefer to put in a report, and insert loads of other code that isn’t relevant to the subject of the report. There are, of course, other capabilities and workflows in these other programs that have their uses. Site offers MS Excel spreadsheets for structural engineering such as. You won’t be able to just switch over everything you normally do into the other software without having to leave some of the functions you use behind. If instead you normally write elaborate reports in Mathcad with things like formatted plots, tables, and program blocks, then you’ll have a much harder time. If you normally use Mathcad for simple isolated calculations, just for the sake of getting a clear answer, perhaps with units perhaps not, then you can probably transition to Maple or Mathematica rather easily. Inputs are tensile yield and ultimate strengths and section. My experience is similar - Smath should probably not be trusted to calculations you will need to refer to years from now (the developer may move on to other things) and Maple is more of a mathematician/student’s tool than an engineering utility. Bending Modulus.xlsm is a macro enabled Excel workbook for estimating plastic bending modulus. I’ve given both Smath and Maple a try, too.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |